Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01511
Original file (BC 2013 01511.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-01511

	XXXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 31 Jan 13, be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He had a medical condition during the contested FA, which may have precluded him from obtaining a satisfactory overall rating.

Is support of his appeal, the applicant submits an AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing,” signed by his medical provider stating the medical condition may have caused him to fail the FA and further evaluation would be required.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently separated from the military the Regular Air Force.

On 31 Jan 13 the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained an unsatisfactory score.  

Examiner’s Note: The applicant’s fitness record is no longer available in AFFMS, presumably due to separation from the Air Force. 

On 22 Jan 14 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “Insufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422 and medical documents.”  


In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander within five days of the assessment.  If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results.  The Airman will then be required to retest within five duty days or when capable based on the recommendations of the medical provider and the Exercise Physiologist (EP).

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request. Although the applicant provided an AF Form 108 from his medical provider indicating he had reported symptoms that may have caused fit test failure, there is no documentation from his unit commander indicating his/her decision to invalidate the FA.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 14 Feb 14 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  While the applicant has provided documentation indicating he had a medical condition, he has not met his burden of proving how this condition precluded him from successfully completing the contested FA.  In this respect, we note the AF Form 108, signed by his medical provider stating he may have had a medical condition and further evaluation is required; however, it was not signed by his commander, nor was a letter provided from the commander requesting the FA be invalidated.  Moreover, the applicant’s submission does not contain any AF Forms 422s stating his profile exemptions and the Fitness Screening Questionnaire he was required to complete prior to completing the assessment.  Should the applicant provide such evidence, we would be willing to reconsider his request.  However, in view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.  
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-01511 in Executive Session on 27 Mar 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Ms. XXXXXXXX, Chair
	Ms. XXXXXXXX, Vice Chair
	Ms. XXXXXXXX, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 25 Mar 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 17 Oct 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Feb 14.




                                   XXXXXXXX
                                   Chair	



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02244

    Original file (BC 2013 02244.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant provided an AF Form 108 signed by his medical provider stating that there was a medical condition that precluded him from passing the FA and recommended invalidation of the FA. The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 24 Jul 13 80.33 Satisfactory *25 Apr 13 26.33 Unsatisfactory 12 Oct 12 82.33 Satisfactory 28 Mar 12 85.44 Satisfactory 30 Dec 11 72.00 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA On 2 Jan 14 a similar request...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03063

    Original file (BC 2013 03063.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when indicated; however, failure to complete FSQ does not invalidate the FA. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). In this respect, we note the applicant’s submission does not contain sufficient documentation to include; a medical determination letter from his medical provider indicating a medical condition; support...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02592

    Original file (BC 2013 02592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    from the Unit CC;” and Atch 1, Para 13 “If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results.” The applicant’s last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score AC Measurement Rating 2 Aug 2013 82.20 38.00” Satisfactory 15 May 2013 16.50 39.50” Unsatisfactory 6 Nov 2012 83.30 38.50” Satisfactory *24 Oct 2012 0.00 40.00” Unsatisfactory 30 Jul 2012 74.10 39.00” Unsatisfactory *Annotates Contested FA: On 7 Jan 14, a similar request was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02538

    Original file (BC 2013 02538.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For RegAF and AGR Airmen, the FAC (or UFPM where no FAC exists) will enter the FA results in AFFMS on the 6th duty day if the Commander does not invalidate test results or no response from the Commander is received within this timeframe;” Atch 1, Para 10a. Commander memorandum, medical docs, or FAC memorandum).” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove the contested FA from AFFMS,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01784

    Original file (BC 2013 01784.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 28 Jan 13 0.00 Unsatisfactory 29 Oct 12 68.78 Unsatisfactory 30 Apr 12 88.00 Satisfactory 20 Oct 11 Exempt Exempt *26 Jul 11 67.50 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA On 16 Dec 13 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “Insufficient evidence, specifically no commander invalidation.” In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03375

    Original file (BC 2013 03375.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03375 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 5 Mar 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01550

    Original file (BC 2013 01550.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01550 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 19 Dec 12 and a duplicate FA entry dated 1 Sep 10 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). He received an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member's Qualification Status, dated 9...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00450

    Original file (BC-2012-00450.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01465

    Original file (BC 2013 01465.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01465 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 27 Sep 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 22 Jan 14 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04890

    Original file (BC 2013 04890.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04890 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 28 Aug 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). Also, there was no indication the commander wanted to invalidate the Fitness Assessment.” In accordance with (IAW)...